Quantcast
Channel: CentOS Bug Tracker - Issues
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 19115

0007672: lvcreate created device-mapper device, but LVM didn't create the device on PV

$
0
0
The affected system is still running:<br /> # uname -a<br /> Linux share8.xxxxxx.xx.xx 2.6.32-431.5.1.el6.x86_64 <a href="http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1">0000001</a> SMP Wed Feb 12 00:41:43 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux<br /> <br /> Installed packages in question are:<br /> device-mapper-persistent-data-0.2.8-4.el6_5.x86_64<br /> device-mapper-libs-1.02.79-8.el6.x86_64<br /> device-mapper-event-1.02.79-8.el6.x86_64<br /> device-mapper-1.02.79-8.el6.x86_64<br /> device-mapper-event-libs-1.02.79-8.el6.x86_64<br /> lvm2-libs-2.02.100-8.el6.x86_64<br /> lvm2-2.02.100-8.el6.x86_64<br /> <br /> It is a guest on a VMWare ESX.<br /> <br /> The system has 5 PV (sd[bcdef]) in a VG named "share0".<br /> <br /> We already had several LVs on it and created another one with<br /> (see archive/share0_00036-1607104706.vg)<br /> # lvcreate -l 167 -n ter_analyticlv share0<br /> <br /> The LV was formated using mkfs.ext4 afterwards and mounted. log/messages noted that with<br /> Sep 9 14:00:11 share8 kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-27): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: <br /> <br /> <br /> After some hours another LV was created...<br /> (see archive/share0_00038-705821464.vg) using<br /> # lvcreate -l 163 -n euroliblv share0<br /> <br /> The LV was formated using mkfs.ext4 and mounted. Again, messages said:<br /> Sep 9 17:17:30 share8 kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-28): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: <br /> <br /> At very same time the first troubles were visible:<br /> Sep 9 17:17:34 share8 kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-27): ext4_mb_generate_buddy: EXT4-fs: group 704: 31712 blocks in bitmap, 21 in gd<br /> <br /> Since we recognized that dm-27 behaved badly and the filesystem got corrupted we tried to figure out what happend.<br /> <br /> diff'ing archive/share0_00036-1607104706.vg and archive/share0_00038-705821464.vg shows that the creation of dm-27 had no visible impact in LVM.<br /> <br /> Currently the system is in a state were device-mapper knows of dm-27 which is also known as:<br /> # df /dev/mapper/share0-ter_analyticlv<br /> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on<br /> /dev/mapper/share0-ter_analyticlv<br /> 174758768 156585984 17124208 91% /shares/TER_ANALYTIC<br /> <br /> # ls -l /dev/mapper/share0-ter_analyticlv<br /> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Sep 9 14:00 /dev/mapper/share0-ter_analyticlv -> ../dm-27<br /> <br /> but LVM doesn't know about the LV at all<br /> # lvdisplay /dev/mapper/share0-ter_analyticlv<br /> One or more specified logical volume(s) not found.<br /> <br /> The second LV created on that day (dm-28) is<br /> # df /dev/mapper/share0-euroliblv <br /> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on<br /> /dev/mapper/share0-euroliblv<br /> 41858368 21107760 20493292 51% /shares/eurolib<br /> <br /> # ls -l /dev/mapper/share0-euroliblv<br /> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Oct 5 15:42 /dev/mapper/share0-euroliblv -> ../dm-28<br /> <br /> Looking at the output of lvmdump -aclmu we found:<br /> # cat dmsetup_table|egrep '(euro|ter_)'<br /> share0-ter_analyticlv: 0 350224384 linear 8:32 3674212352<br /> share0-euroliblv: 0 83886080 linear 8:32 3674212352<br /> <br /> ... same device (/dev/sdc), same start sector<br /> <br /> But<br /> # pvdisplay -m /dev/sdc<br /> only knows about<br /> Physical extent 1752 to 1791:<br /> Logical volume /dev/share0/euroliblv<br /> Logical extents 0 to 39<br /> <br /> <br /> Not very surprisingly both filesystems show (mostly?) the same content after repair.<br /> <br /> # pvdisplay -m /dev/sd[bcdef]<br /> shows all LVs in the system except for the one dm-27 uses. LVM is no aware of the LV at all, but device-mapper uses it happily destroying both filesystems of dm-27 and dm-28.<br /> <br /> These "lvcreate"s were done by a perl script calling "system(...)" and checking the return value. We would have noticed if lvcreate returned with an error. It didn't. So, the script continued with mkfs.ext4.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 19115

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>