There's a reason that the "Linux distribution" concept ended up being structured the way it has been - it's around "who owns updates", specifically for security.<br />
<br />
With CentOS, that's a fairly clear process today - updates flow from Red Hat, the ball passes to CentOS in a fairly transparent way.<br />
<br />
With things built in CBS, the issue becomes a lot murkier. While I do think Feodra's trademark guidelines around this are not ideal, they are capturing something important that we're just glossing over - users need to know that CentOS Atomic contains CBS content.<br />
<br />
I can take ownership of creating a release package, but let's figure out what it should be called.
↧
